error thing happened again[edit source]
sorry but the "Error: This action has been automatically identified as harmful, and therefore disallowed." thing has happened again, I believe this is because I accidentally erased a period in a sentence and so I rewrote it again, then I wrote my actual edit. --Unfunny322 (talk) 05:02, 15 June 2021 (PDT)
hey can you delete this file please?[edit source]
sorry um can you please delete GZEB bold claim 2.PNG? Also last time I asked to delete instead of overwrite because people could still see the file history.
hey dude[edit source]
- All right, it's done. Apologies for this, I had to tighten the screws after I had a slew of spam accounts coming to the wiki. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 11:12, 14 July 2021 (PDT)
image restore[edit source]
Political views getting in your way[edit source]
Your whole re-edit of LGBT community was unnecessary, you removed many of the sentences that explained the hypocrisy and hostility from the community. Even though there are clear toxic examples of individuals in the LGBT+ community that ostracize eachother, such as bisexuals and out of the realm heterosexuals. You notice this particularly on Tumblr and Twitter.
- I removed many things because your revision really leaves a lot to be desired. I still kept the mention that TERFs and biphobes are present and exist within the community, so I do not understand what is your issue here. Additionally, your "related pages" section is full of red links of unrelated and possibly out of scope articles, especially "Communism" and "Neo-Nazism", is there any strong correlation between these and the LGBTQ+ community? The related pages section is where you add related pages, not distant cousins. Although there is Milo Yiannopoulos in the community, and yes, he is a Nazi, that does not warrant a red link to an ideology that is never mentioned on the article in the first place. You should know that red links also hurt the SEO of this page, it will rank poorly on search engines. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 06:09, 20 July 2021 (PDT)
One Another Note[edit source]
I'm going to need access to the previous iteration, as I did make new improved article edits on the previous iteration to copy and paste onto this iteration.--Theryan26 (talk) 19:07, 19 July 2021 (PDT)
- I just gave you the "member" right over there. You should be able to view the wiki normally now. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 05:46, 20 July 2021 (PDT)
Regarding Syphn and The Ceasornator articles[edit source]
I understand why you think the articles are "stale", but this all happened to me personally back in February-April 2018 and even then I did not screenshot a ton of the things they said and did, all I can do is write down what I remember what they did to me. I cannot magically go back in time and screenshot everything they did, and besides screenshots can be easily cropped, and taken out of context. This isn't an excuse, this is what I had to deal with throughout February-August 2018 dealing with Syphn's obnoxious behavior and The Ceasornator's hypocritical rants and bullshit.--Theryan26 (talk) 02:54, 27 July 2021 (PDT)
- I understand and sympathize with your problem since I wrote the CyberRobotnix article. When I first wrote it, it had so little sources that someone removed something unsourced from the article until I could find proof that it did indeed happen and thankfully the guy in the article is loud mouthed, so he admitted it later down the line on another site. Most of the sources that did exist before that point links back to archives of Google Plus which isn't available to the public anymore. Speaking of which, someone tried to add a quote to the article that allegedly came from CyberRobotnix and I had to revert it because I couldn't find evidence that this was a real quote. Additionally, I gave it a bad article nomination instead of nominating it for deletion which would have caused the article to be removed because I don't consider it to be completely worthless, if it is properly improved with sources (Or any sort of evidence whatsoever). Maybe the people you're speaking of will open their mouths and say something incriminating that could be added to the articles. Otherwise, they might repeat what they have done to you to someone else and that too can be used against them in the articles. MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 10:36, 28 July 2021 (PDT)
some stuff I would like to add that might cross rules[edit source]
hey so a mod everyone thought was gzeb turned out to actually be gzeb and me and some others actually know some stuff about that mod (he gave us his real age after giving us a fake age to get the adult role, and he told us the city he lives in; "I live in x. That city has millions of people in it it's not like you are going to find me.") would like to add some of the stuff (specifically age and city) edit edit: weird thing, so uh the only actual photo of gzeb is a feet pic of him, can I add that?